Customize your website

Woman who had dogs seized says she did nothing wrong



Published on December 2nd, 2009
Published on Febuary 20th, 2010
Staff ~ The News RSS Feed
Topics :
WESTVILLE , Halifax

WESTVILLE - Janice Bingley contends she did nothing wrong, her dogs were never abused or in danger in her home.
But the 22 dogs aren't home, they were seized by Nova Scotia SPCA special constables on Oct. 19.
"It's been hard, we're still missing them," Bingley said on Tuesday.
"The kids are still asking when they're coming home."
Bingley said there's no charges that are valid in her case and she has nothing to hide. She has gone public with her case because she feels that she has been convicted in the court of public opinion.
"I've been publicly judged. By public opinion I'm guilty of something but yet nobody questions the SPCA. There was not even a reason stated on the warrant."
Bingley moved into her Westville home in early August and said she never received any complaints from neighbours about her dogs.
"The neighbours here are quite friendly…They (the SPCA) say there was a complaint. I don't know where they came from."
Bingley said she feels the seizure is related in some way to her advertising great Dane pups for sale online. She said she posted the ad and then was banned about a week later from that website. She said a few days after that the SPCA arrived at her door.
Bingley released to the media all documents that she has related to the case including the warrant, letters, records from her vet and email correspondence.
She said the SPCA case is groundless.
"There is no charge, I can recite to you with my eyes closed the animal cruelty act. There's no charge."
But she does want to be charged, she wants to have her day in court.
"The way that it stands right now, if I'm not charged I have no defence. I don't care what they charge me for, put me in front of a judge."
She now faces a bill for $15,768.78 from the SPCA for expenses related to the seizure and care of the dogs. A letter from the SPCA said if she does not pay the bill in full, or make necessary arrangements for payment, by Dec. 18, then the dogs will become property of the SPCA.
She said there's no way she can pay such a large bill so quickly.
"They're going to say I made no attempt to pay it…The 18th will come and go, they'll own our dogs."

Provincial SPCA says it is considering charges

The provincial office of the SPCA said charges may be laid in Janice Bingley's case.
"It's an ongoing investigation," Nova Scotia SPCA executive director Kristin Williams said from Halifax on Tuesday afternoon. "I can tell you we are considering charges."
Williams said it is too early at this point to say what charges could be laid.
"It's difficult to say, there are a number of factors, including co-ordination with local police and getting reports together. It will likely be a couple of weeks or in that time frame."
Williams said the dogs - adults and puppies, some great Danes and other breeds - remain under control of the SPCA.
"The animals remain within our care…They're currently in what we call foster care… It's a way to care for the animals in a home environment."

Comments

  • Username
    Dog
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:32:06

    Sharon, SHAME ON YOU for supporting someone who is hoarding and neglecting animals. It is sad to see that this day and age the mindsets like this still exist. 22 dogs regardless if they are puppies or mature require a lot of work. Thank god that we have trained individuals that can interject and provide a safe haven for these poor dogs. The news report lastnight on CTV didn't do this person any favors. The conditons these animals lived in were terrible!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Curious
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:32:06

    I am interested in reading those documents. Where could they be found on Facebook....

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    County resident
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:32:05

    Seriously how much better are the dogs in the spca? Yes they get fed, how big is the run there? If this woman isn't charged yet it couldn't of been that bad. All you people on here commenting, I'm glad you all know the real story because the woman on the other end doesn't even know what's going on. Typical on here!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Gina
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:59

    The SPCA does not just take animals from people for no reason. In fact, they need a warrant to take them and a judge does not just sign warrants willy-nilly, you have to have a solid case for taking them before a judge will sign the warrant to seize. To say they were taken for no reason is simply ridiculous and laughable.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    tracey
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:59

    Can you say backyard breeder ?
    Who needs 22 dogs? And the SPCA would have not acted unless there was a complaint by someone who left their name. They do not just go out and take dogs unless there is a reason. They have enough animals to deal with on a daily basis.
    Maybe the owner is just looking for sympathy from the public. Well none coming from this house.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    monty
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:50

    I completely agree with dog lover, our family chooses not to get a dog because we know that we cannot provide the necessary care and stability. I am curious as to how big the home is where these dogs were kept...how big was the run area for the dogs, Iwas it fenced, I mean they are Great Danes??? And i am sorry but if you say that you can afford to keep these dogs fed, vaccinated, vet checked, then how can you not afford to pay the bill the SPCA has. These dogs are MUCH better off in the care of the SPCA and hopefully each one will be adopted by caring loving families who can properly house and feed them. The SPCA would not seize the dogs unless there were major issues with the care of these dogs. I personally would NOT want to live next door to someone who owned 22 dogs

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Sharon
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:48

    Anyone who is interested in the full story the documents can be found on facebook. Receipts from the vet the warrant signed by justice of the peace. Letter from the vet, registrations for all the dogs. This was not a backyard breeder it is the first time the dog 3 years old had a litter of 15 pups.

    I am interested in the fact that the dogs were seized on October 19 and still no charges. Sounds fishy to me. Give back the dogs.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    I saw the news.
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:45

    Last night when I watched the news I did see some dogs that looked rather thin. I also noticed that the home they showed didn't appear to have any fencing. I don't understand how these dogs can be seized, no charges laid and this woman expected to pay for animals that were taken out of her care (although it appears to be lacking) and placed in the SPCA's care and still expect her to pay. No charge has been laid boggles my mind. Instead of paying on that bill before the 18th she should be consulting a lawyer.

    Honestly though, who needs 7 dogs? Of course she's going to say she was going to have them fixed. The animals appear to be better off. The dogs were spoken for... Were they free?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Margie
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:43

    I think what the Halifax SPCA is doing is extremly unfair.They had six weeks to investigate and they did nothing except send Janice a large bill for Board for the dogs. Now they say it could be weeks before they have the information they need..Once the 18th of Dec. comes they will take ownership and adopt out the dogs and we would like to know why, What gave them the right to do this to her, Her only crime is having seven dogs, as for the puppies, How could she know how many pups there would be. She was going to have the dogs fivxed , this was to be their one and only pregnancy. Its really hard to believe in fairness and Justice when something like this can happen with no explanation.
    Do the right thing return the family pets

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Dog
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:37

    I am curious of how a person can afford to feed, vaccinate and provide adequate shelter for 22 dogs. A simple check up at the vet for 1 dog costs on average $40. I would say the SPCA made the right call on this one!

    ZERO TOLERANCE FOR ANIMAL NEGLECT!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Colin
    - February 22nd, 2010 at 13:31:34

    I saw this lady and her dogs on the news last night. They showed 2 or 3 of the older dofgs and the were so malnourished and skinny it was sad, ribs sticking out . I dont know if this was the case for all of the dogs or not. It definitely seemed like a case of back yard breeding because Ms. Bingley said herself most of the puppies were spoken for. Looked to me like the spca did they right thing, but who knows

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The News is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Advertising