• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (4)
  •  

N.S. Chamber director wants property tax system revamped

Nova Scotia Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Wayne Fiander speaks to members of the Pictou County Chamber of Commerce and others at a breakfast meeting on Thursday. ADAM MACINNIS – THE NEWS

Nova Scotia Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Wayne Fiander speaks to members of the Pictou County Chamber of Commerce and others at a breakfast meeting on Thursday. ADAM MACINNIS – THE NEWS

Published on February 7, 2013
Published on February 7, 2013
Adam MacInnis  RSS Feed
Topics :
N.S. Chamber , Nova Scotia Chamber of Commerce , Pictou County Chamber of Commerce , STELLARTON , Nova Scotia , Trenton

STELLARTON – Wayne Fiander wants the current property tax system done away with and proposes a replacement that would see tax based on either an income or consumption basis.

The Nova Scotia Chamber of Commerce executive director spoke at a meeting hosted by the Pictou County Chamber of Commerce Thursday and spoke about the provincial chamber’s initiative to speak out against what he believes in an unfair tax system.

Fiander said the goal in looking for a different tax system isn't to throw stones at anyone, but to simply ask a question: "Are we willing to improve on a 19th century revenue model?"

On average, businesses in Nova Scotia pay 234 per cent more on assessed value than homeowners and receive the same services, Fiander said. In Trenton it's 276 per cent and in New Glasgow and Stellarton it's around 230 per cent.

This he said is unfair and doesn't meet any of the qualifications of a good tax.

Other provinces including New Brunswick and P.E.I. have a cap on the amount that the commercial tax rate can be above residential.

"We like the idea of a cap on the multiple," Fiander said. "It's done in a lot of provinces. We feel that's a more accurate way to assess taxes on property."

He suggested the rate should stay at 150 per cent of what the residential rate is.

Their final and ultimate goal is for the province to investigate the use of either the HST system or income tax or a flat tax and some combination of all three as a means to eliminate property tax. Such a process would take at least five to 10 years, even if everyone agreed, but he said he believes it'd be best for the province.

So far politicians have been leery of the idea.

“They’re afraid to touch it because they’re scared to step out of this little box and have someone throw a tomato at them,” Fiander said.

He hopes with time though that people will get behind the idea though and show leaders that there’s enough public support for it. To that end he offered to speak to local municipalities to talk about the program.

“I’ll go anywhere anyone wants to listen,” he said.

There were only three councillors who attended the meeting, Robert Parker from the county and Lynn MacDonald and Lennie White from Westville.

MacDonald expressed some concern about how the program would be switched over, particularly lifting the cap.

“If you take the cap off you could drive people out of their homes,” she said.

 

amacinnis@ngnews.ca

On Twitter: @NgNewsAdam

Comments

  • Username
    Johnny smoke
    - February 8, 2013 at 10:31:21

    First of all let's treat the individual the same way that business are treated. Let's start with the obvious. Let every penny and fee paid to each level of government, whether it be municipal, provincial, H.S.T. included deductible from our income tax, let us deduct also insurance coverage, heating expenses, maintenance expenses, and yes if need be medical expenses dollar or dollar not some tax credit that gives you roughly .15 cents for every dollar spent. Then and only then can anyone have any sympathy for those who recent reports show charge an additional 30-60% mark up over identical items purchased cross border. If it is as they say the difference in price is due to the heavy tax burden then the various governments who have been on a spending and hiring spree will have to reign in their outlandish demands for more and more tax money. If you believe in your wildest dreams that any bureaucrat is capable of such a change, then you are delusional indeed.I have recently read a story regarding the statement of how a million dollars of economic activity was generated by a public event. Sadly lacking was a profit or loss statement, that means that once again we the sheeple will have to ante up so that some can have their amusements, and we wonder why red inks flows like water. Think again.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    arthur sinclair
    - February 8, 2013 at 07:35:40

    It is amazing how people like Mr Fiander seem to be oblivious to the financial facts of life. Canada by Mr Harpers own admission has a very low rate of cooperate tax much lower than that of the USA. Yet we pay on average 30 to 40% more for goods than they do in the USA. Take milk for instance, the americans are complaining about paying $3,53 a US gallon= to 3.8 liters while now in Pictou County the price is $4.17 for two liters. I have been on line comparing prices with Costco and many items are so much lower in the USA at their own outlets. Automobiles if you have the ability to buy north American models are fantastic prices and pick them up at the border for a steal of a deal. As the owner of a residence I can not write my property tax off as a business expense nor my electric bill or oil if I used it. lets have a public forum and discuss economics in a sane way. I have had a lot of unsatisfactory purchases from businesses in the area and I find it highly offensive, let the Chamber steer business in the area to be more for the consumer and that will inspire people to buy localy and then property taxes will be less of an issue with higher income level for the merchants.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack Taxpayer
    - February 8, 2013 at 07:04:24

    Yes, let's stop taxing businesses and dump it all on the residential taxpayers. This might take on legs, if the charter accountant led party ever crawls out of the political basement. Refresh my memory on this point. Who gets to claim a tax deduction for their municipal taxes ... The resident or the businesses? It certainly isn't a write-off for residents. Also, who gets to pass their costs of taxes along to others.. Certainly not residential taxpayers. We do not need more business people running our government, a a potential local candidate recently stated. We need people with intelligence and a sense of fairness.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    jack
    - February 8, 2013 at 00:01:36

    So Wayne Fiander of the Nova Scotia Chamber of Commerce thinks taxes are too high for businesses? But of course he does because representing business is his bread and butter. This is hardly an unbiased view at all. But I would hazard a wild guess and say that the average taxpayer who has seen his taxes rise year after year and then seen the level of service provided by governments decline in a huge way would think it is unfair that so much taxpayers money is wasted on businesses who should be paying their own way. Most governments love business because there is something in it for the politicians while they look down with contempt at the little guy who is paying their salaries and perks.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Advertising