Landry calls for law on intimate images

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Justice Minister Ross Landry talks to reporters in this file photo. RYAN TAPLIN/METRO HALIFAX

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia’s justice minister is pushing Ottawa to make it illegal to distribute intimate images for a malicious or sexual purpose without consent, a move he says was prompted by the death of Rehtaeh Parsons.

Ross Landry said Friday that he plans to raise the matter with federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson next week in Ottawa.

Landry said he decided to ask for changes to the Criminal Code after meeting with Leah Parsons, Rehtaeh’s mother.

“It’s one of the commitments that I made last week to Ms. Parsons in the discussion,” said Landry.

“As I heard her and others speak, it’s about images getting out there that don’t have the permission of the parties involved.”

Landry said he would like to see the law also result in the prosecution of people who redistribute the images in question. But he added that part of his discussion with Nicholson would focus on whether such a law would be enforceable.

Dan MacRury, a Crown prosecutor who is Nova Scotia’s representative on a national cybercrime working group, said he believes an enforceable law could be put in place, despite the challenges presented by technology.

“The child pornography provisions that are before the code are enforceable and they involve technology at the present time,” said MacRury.

“From a technology point of view, it’s like any investigation. (Police) would have to prove who sent the item.”

He said what constitutes an intimate image would have to be worked out as the law is drafted, but the intent would be to crack down on the distribution of harmful images depicting genitalia.

“Obviously we wouldn’t be looking at just kissing.”

MacRury said while there are provisions in the Criminal Code that outlaw child pornography, there are no protections in place to prevent the malicious dissemination of sexual images for adults. He said the province would also push to address that gap.

Nicholson could not be reached for comment.

Andrew Younger, the Liberal Opposition deputy house leader, said he welcomed the initiative, particularly after Landry had initially said he saw no reason to delve further into Rehtaeh’s case.

“He recognized quite quickly that this was a more serious issue than he realized and he’s taking action now,” said Younger.

The 17-year-old Halifax girl attempted suicide on April 4 and was taken off life-support three days later. Her family alleges she was sexually assaulted by four boys in November 2011 and a photograph of the incident was passed around her school.

The RCMP said they looked into the allegations but concluded in consultation with Nova Scotia’s Public Prosecution Service there were no grounds to lay charges. They have since reopened theirinvestigation after receiving what they describe as “new and "credible” information.

Premier Darrell Dexter has also announced an independent review of the RCMP’s original investigation once the current probe concludes.

He also appointed Marilyn More, the minister responsible for the status of women, to oversee the province’s overall response to Rehtaeh’s death.

On Thursday, More announced the appointment of two education experts from Ontario to conduct an independent review of how the Halifax Regional School Board responded.

Organizations: RCMP, Public Prosecution Service, Halifax Regional School Board

Geographic location: Nova Scotia, Ottawa, Ontario

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Unimpressed
    April 21, 2013 - 00:58

    I'd like to take this opportunity to remind Minister Landry that this "crime" could not have taken place if this girl was not being sexually assaulted. I realize at this time, until convictions have been made, the assault is still considered to be "alleged", but had this not happened, there would be nothing to have taken photos of in the first place. Your head in the sand approach to this issue makes me so angry. You need to take the initiative to teach young men and women about what constitutes illegal sexual behaviour, including rape, sexual assault and statutory rape so that they are aware of what it is, how to identify if they have been the victim of it or if they have put themselves into a situation where they have perpetrated it, not try to pick up the pieces and clean up the mess AFTER a situation like this has occurred. Prevention IS the cure. The photos are the aftermath from the REAL crime, which you have been treating like it was not a big deal... like saying if you distribute photos of someone you murdered, it's a more punishable offence than the actual murder. Come on. It's time to re-evaluate your priorities here and actually support your obligations to uphold existing laws.

  • James Baillie
    April 19, 2013 - 20:17

    Andrew Younger, the Liberal Opposition deputy house leader, said he welcomed the initiative, particularly after Landry had initially said he saw no reason to delve further into Rehtaeh’s case.Yes but that was before the people with pitchforks gathered and the justice minister had to get off the pot and actually do his job.

  • Tired of Bullies with No Consequences
    April 19, 2013 - 17:40

    This is a small step in the right direction, but what about sexual assault? It is already against the law, yet nothing happened to the 4 boys in question. I work in the education field and see kids being bullies every day with no consequences for their actions. They deny their wrong doings, have their parents back them up and re-direct the blame, and nothing is ever done by the schools or the police. Why would kids change their behaviours if they know that nothing is going to happen to them? Kids need to learn to accept responsibility, and not have Mom and Dad defend them while pointing their fingers elsewhere. God Bless the parents out there that are actually teaching their children morals, respect, and raising them as respectable and responsible citizens.

  • Jason M
    April 19, 2013 - 17:18

    Kind of rich, considering your party has voted against EVERY tougher crime penalty put forth in the last 2 decades and have sided, and still side with the Liberals who gave us most these laws, and fight tooth and nail to make them even softer and not to put people in jail. That's all public record for anybody who cares to look it up. You can't change your mind when it's politically correct for you near election time.